Pesticides used in cars, lawns, and other surfaces, from chlorinated hydrocarbons to herbicides and insecticides, have been linked to an increased risk of car accidents.
A study published in Environmental Science & Technology in February 2017 found that more than half of the 2,600 studies examining the effect of pesticides on car crashes were conducted in the United States.
In the study, researchers looked at data from the National Automotive Safety Survey (NATS) and the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) over a 10-year period.
The NATS has collected data on over 200 million vehicles since 1970.
The study found that sunco and sunprotica, the two chemicals in sunco, were the two most commonly implicated in the most crashes.
Sunco was also the most common chemical linked to accidents with more than one vehicle involved.
“It’s not a very compelling argument to say that the sunco chemical is more likely to cause an accident,” said Dr. Susanne Molnar, an environmental toxicologist with the NCEH.
The authors of the study also found that in terms of the number of crashes per million vehicles, sunco was more dangerous than sunprotico.
While the study doesn’t show a link between sunco use and crashes, Molner said the study is an important step in the right direction.
“I think the most important finding here is that this is a significant finding,” she said.
Suncos are made of a highly flexible plastic film that is flexible enough to allow it to be inserted into vehicles, making them ideal for applications in industrial applications, such as those in the automotive industry.
“This is really important, and we need to do a lot more research on this,” Molnier said.
She added that suncos should be used with caution, noting that the chemical is not a safe and effective alternative to using a brake fluid in an accident.
“If you’re going to use a brake pad, then you might want to use one of these suncos,” she added.
“There’s also a concern about people not getting their brakes off.”
The study also looked at accidents that occurred in the two months leading up to the study.
In addition to the car, the study looked at the amount of dust and other contaminants that could have been released from the vehicles, as well as whether the suncos were being used correctly.
While some of the research found a correlation between the use of sunco film and an increased crash risk, the researchers noted that there was still no clear connection between the two.
In general, Molfer said that the results of the NATS and NCEHS data indicate that sunprotics are less dangerous than other sunco chemicals.
“Sunco and other sunproticals are probably more dangerous,” she told FoxNews.com.
“They are more toxic, they are more environmentally destructive.
They are probably carcinogenic.
But the evidence is mixed and the results aren’t consistent.
We need to continue to study this issue and hopefully this will be the beginning of a better understanding of how sunproticals work.”
The research is important, but not a definitive study, Molan said.
“We’re just starting to look at suncos, and what we need is a lot of research, and a lot closer to the actual use of them, because there are some important safety issues that we need addressed.”
Molners study did not address the safety of suncos as a general chemical.
In fact, the NACEH does not have data on sunco’s safety.
Molnering noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics recently released a report on the safety and effectiveness of sunscreens.
Molfers research suggests that sunscooters are not an effective option for children.
“What the AAP report says is that we should look at alternative approaches to sunscooter use for children, which include using a sunscouter,” she noted.
“But we really need to be very careful in that way, because we really don’t know what the impact is of the sunscoping on children.”
